Drawing for IHIP.NET

USPTO serial 75745865

IHIP.NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IHIP.NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALEXANDRA J. HORNE

BRIAN COLLINS MARIN BUSINESS LAW21 WARD STLARKSPUR, CA 94939UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DATABASE CREATION AND MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF INTERACTIVE INSURANCE, BENEFITS, FINANCIAL SERVICES MARKETING, DATA MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICESACTIVE—
035Providing cooperative advertising and marketing of financial services for others and data management and administration for others over a local area network and a global computer network; online ordering services featuring computers, computer peripherals, computer software and computer accessories over a global computer network; leasing of business office equipment to small businesses over a global computer networkACTIVE—
036INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS OVER A LOCAL AREA NETWORK AND A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—
042LEASING OF COMPUTER TO SMALL BUSINESSES OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 3, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 14, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 7, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 7, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 14, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 22, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 8, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance