USPTO serial 75745899
FAIRYLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, REID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAIRYLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William E. Alford
WILLIAM E ALFORD BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FEATURING COMPUTER GAMES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DESIGNING DOLL CLOTHING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MULTIMEDIA THAT ENABLES COMPUTER INTERACTION WITH USERS IN THE FIELD OF ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATION; MOTION PICTURE FILMS AND PRERECORDED VIDEO TAPES FEATURING ANIMATION, ACTORS AND ACTRESSES OF FICTIONAL CHARACTERS IN FICTIONAL STORIES; DISCS, NAMELY, COMPACT DISCS, DVDS, LASER DISCS, CD-ROMS, HDCD MINI-DISCS, LP RECORDS, AND 45 RECORDS ALL FEATURING MUSIC, SOUND RECORDINGS, STILL PICTURES, MOTION PICTURES AND MOVIES; PRE-RECORDED AUDIO CASSETTES FEATURING SOUND RECORDINGS; AND PRE-RECORDED VIDEO CASSETTES FEATURING FAIRY TALE MOVIES, FAIRY TALE STORIES, FAIRY TALE RHYMES, AND FAIRY TALE CARTOONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |