Drawing for AT&T BROADBAND PHONE COMMUNICATOR

USPTO serial 75746017

AT&T BROADBAND PHONE COMMUNICATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WELTSCH, KEITH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AT&T BROADBAND PHONE COMMUNICATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, THE ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, FACSIMILE, DATA, VIDEO AND INFORMATION; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO WORLDWIDE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, OTHER COMPUTER NETWORKS, ON-LINE SERVICES AND BULLETIN BOARDS; PROVIDING BACK BONE TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK SERVICES TO OTHERS TO ENABLE THEM TO DISPLAY CONTENT ON WORLDWIDE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND OTHER COMPUTER NETWORKS; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO ON-LINE INFORMATION SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES PROVIDED OVER A WORLDWIDE COMPUTER NETWORK AND A PUBLIC SWITCHED TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, NAMELY, THE SIMULTANEOUS, BI-DIRECTIONAL INTERACTIVE TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, AUDIO, VIDEO, DATA, TEXT, FACSIMILE AND INFORMATION; THE TRANSMISSION OVER CABLE OF ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES AND VOICE, VIDEO, DATA AND FACSIMILE TELEPHONY SERVICESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 19, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Oct 25, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Aug 21, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 3, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 17, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 23, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance