USPTO serial 75746074
PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark E. Miller
MARK E MILLER O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP275 BATTERY STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | material handling machine for use in the manufacturing of semiconductor wafers, reticles, flat panel displays and magnetic media comprising robotic arms, an electronics bay, an electronic identification tag capable of reading infrared, radio frequency or barcode signals, a barcode reader, a display, a keypad, antennas, filtration units, sealed enclosures used to store and transfer semiconductor wafers, reticles, flat panel displays and magnetic media, fans, electromechanical fan controller, reflective laser, pre-aligners which locates and identifies the orientation of a wafer for manufacturing processes, loadports in the nature of cassette transferring interface, and ionizers | ACTIVE | May 10, 2002 |
| 009 | Computer hardware machine; for controlling a material handling computer software for automating, integrating and communicating with material handling machines; optical character recognition apparatus, namely, computer hardware and software for optical character recognition | ACTIVE | May 10, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Asyst Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Asyst Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PLUS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |