USPTO serial 75746284
HARMONY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARMONY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E Krebs
MARLENE J WILLIAMS THELEN REID & PRIEST LLPP O BOX 190187SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-0187UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WIRELESS NETWORKING SYSTEM OF PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MODEMS, PC ADAPTORS, GATEWAYS, ACCESS BRIDGES AND RELATED OPERATING AND DRIVER SOFTWARE FOR SHARING COMPUTING RESOURCES AND ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK AND ACCESS TO A LOCAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Nov 22, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |