USPTO serial 75746292
S888 SHOPPING MALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with S888 SHOPPING MALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Singapare 570140, SG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTINA J HIEBER
CHRISTINA J HIEBER FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVISION OF COMMERCIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION BY MEANS OF A COMPUTER DATABASE; PROVISION OF COMMERCIAL INFORMATION [BUSINESS]; COMPUTERIZED POINT-OF-SALE DATA COLLECTION SERVICES FOR RETAILERS; PROVIDING BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES BY COMPUTER; PROVIDING BUSINESS PROMOTION SERVICES BY COMPUTER; ELECTRONIC RETAILING SERVICES VIA A COMPUTER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 8, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |