USPTO serial 75746613
VERSACLEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2767054Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2003
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VERSACLEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam Claire Beezy
Miriam Claire Beezy Foley & Lardner LLP555 S. Flower Street, Suite 3500Los Angeles, CA 90071-2411UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | thermoplastic elastomer manufacturing plastics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 4, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHELL OIL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by KRATON POLYMERS U.S. LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SHELL OIL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by SHELL OIL COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named VERSACLEAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |