USPTO serial 75746693
CLEAR TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2712376Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 6, 2003
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLEAR TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cristi Trusler
Cristi Trusler Trusler & Associates, PLLCPO BOX 90235Austin, TX 78709-0235UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND PERIPHERALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 20, 1999 |
| 037 | technical support and consultation services in the field of computer hardware via telephone and in person, namely assisting and advising others in the design, use, maintenance and repair of computer hardware | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 20, 1999 |
| 042 | TECHNICAL SUPPORT AND CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE VIA TELEPHONE AND IN PERSON, NAMELY ASSISTING AND ADVISING OTHERS IN THE DESIGN, USE, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND NETWORKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 20, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clear Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Clear Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Clear Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CLEAR TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 6, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |