USPTO serial 75746944
TENDERCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TENDERCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SEOUL, 110-530, KR
Seoul, 110-0178, KR
Seoul, 110-0178, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Franklin T. Dunn
TAMRE F EDWARDS LORD BISSELL & BROOK LLP115 S LASALLE ST STE 3600CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | TEACHING AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, TUTORIAL LESSONS IN THE FIELDS OF ENGLISH, OF MATHEMATICS, OF THE KOREAN LANGUAGE, OF HANJA-CHINESE CHARACTERS, AND OF CREATIVE THINKING; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF TUTORIAL EDUCATION AND DISTRIBUTING COURSE MATERIAL IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; EDUCATIONAL TESTING; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF TUTORIAL INSTRUCTION SERVICES; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING OF EDUCATIONAL COMPETITIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | CHILD CARE SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JEI CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Jaeneung Education Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Jaeneung Education Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TENDERCARE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |