USPTO serial 75747062
IDIRECTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDIRECTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Gatos, CA
LOS GATOS, CA
LOS GATOS, CA
LOS GATOS, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER A. VANDERLAAN
CHRISTOPHER A VANDERLAAN IRELL & MANELLA1800 AVE OF THE STARS STE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4276UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB PAGES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARDS, FOR OTHERS; REGISTRATION OF DOMAIN NAMES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF USES ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; HOSTING DOMAIN NAMES FOR OTHERS BY PROVIDING DOMAIN NAME SYSTEM ROUTING AND MAPPING BETWEEN NETWORK NAMES AND ADDRESSES ON A GLOBAL ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by iDirections, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NAMEZERO.COM. INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NAMEZERO.COM. INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IDIRECTIONS.COM, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IDIRECTIONS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |