USPTO serial 75747249
FROG FILTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FROG FILTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Water purification materials contained in dispensers for use in killing bacteria in swimming pools, hot tubs, and spas | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Swimming pool equipment; namely, valves for dispensing water purification materials in swimming pools, and swimming pool water cleaning and filtering units | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by King Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by King Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named FROG FILTER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |