Drawing for THE ICE ACTION CYCLE

USPTO serial 75747339

THE ICE ACTION CYCLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ICE ACTION CYCLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. Stephen Georgas

M STEPHEN GEORGAS MILLER THOMSONBOX 2720 QUEEN ST W STE 2500TORONTO, ON M5H 3S1

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business consultation services in the field of corporate communications; business marketing and corporate identity consulting services; developing promotional and corporate image campaigns for businesses; preparing live presentations and audio, visual, multi-media and/or print media presentations for use by businesses in advertising and in trade show presentations; producing audio or video infomercials for businesses; arranging and conducting promotional trade shows and business conferences for others; and business travel management services for othersACTIVE—
041production of video tapes, video cassette, CD-ROMS, motion picture films, and television programsACTIVE—
042graphic art design services; computer software design for others; computer site design services for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 3, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance