USPTO serial 75748359
CYBER-COLLABORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROCKETT, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYBER-COLLABORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce W. Longbottom
BRUCE W LONGBOTTOM LEAGRE CHANDLER & MILLARD LLP135 N PENNSYLVANIA STSTE 1400INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Manufacture of general product lines in the field of molds, dies, specialty tooling, and machine parts to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of molds, dies, specialty tooling, machine parts, and custom equipment manufacturing by means of a global computer network; design for others in the field of molds, dies, specialty tooling, machine parts, and custom equipment manufacturing, by means of a global computer network; and engineering services by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Square Deal Tool and Die, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Square Deal Tool and Die, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CYBER-COLLABORATION
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |