Drawing for STUTTGART CENTER FOR CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY

USPTO serial 75748494

STUTTGART CENTER FOR CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STUTTGART CENTER FOR CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald E. Greigg

RONALD E GREIGG GREIGG & GREIGG PLLC1423 POWHATAN ST STE 1ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1389UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Arranging and conducting educational conferences; Educational demonstrations; Educational services, namely, conducting seminars and classes in the field of psychology and psychotherapy, namely, teaching individuals and groups of individuals the techniques for bringing about better maturation of the muscular and nervous systems in order to perfect strength and flexibility of the skeleton and muscles as well as to create a profound change in the self-image and the quality of the student's self-direction; Training in the use of equipment and computers; Entertainment in the nature of horseback riding therapy, movement therapy, and body building therapy; and organizing exhibitions for cultural therapiesACTIVE—
042Health care, namely, educational care to provide health, medical, and psychological consciousness; psychological consultation, psychological counseling, psychological testing, medical services, and medical testing; technical consultation and research in the field of psychology and psychotherapy and medical research; Computer software design for others in the field of data processingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 25, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 27, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance