USPTO serial 75748849
THE SKIN RESOURCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SKIN RESOURCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TRISTRAM R. FALL
TRISTRAM R FALL FOX ROTHSCHILD O'BRIEN & FRANKEL LLP2000 MARKET ST 10TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Communication services, namely providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of information among computer users, featuring dermatology and skin care medical information, and providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of medical information among users, featuring dermatology and skin care medical information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing on-line medical information, featuring dermatology and skin care via a global computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Skin Resource Limited, The
- Other trademarks owned by Skin Resource Limited, The
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE SKIN RESOURCE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |