USPTO serial 75748921
S.B.U. - STRATEGIC BUSINESS UNIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with S.B.U. - STRATEGIC BUSINESS UNIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Furniture, Mirrors goods of wood and similar, namely - Armchairs; Bamboo curtains; Bed frames; Bedroom furniture; Beds; Benches; Bookcases; Bumper guards for Furniture; Cabinets; Caskets; Chairs, Coat stands; Computer Furniture; Cots; Couches; Credenzas; Cribs; Cupboards; Cushions; Divans; Drafting tables; Golf course benches; High chairs; Infant Cradles; Infant walkers; Kennels with Carriers; Lecterns; Living room furniture; Love seats; Mattress cushions; Mattresses; Mirror tiles; Nap mats; Office furniture; Ottomans; Outdoor Furniture; Picture Frames; Sales and display counters; Screens; Seat Cushions; Sofas; Tables; Trestle Tables; Umbrella stands; Wardrobes; Waterbeds; Wood Boxes | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | 44DA | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |