USPTO serial 75749089
EFINDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNODGRASS, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EFINDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burlingame, CA
Burlingame, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY SCOTT SMITH
GREGORY SCOTT SMITH LAW OFFICE OF GREGORY SCOTT SMITH3900 NEWPARK MALL RD STE 317NEWARK, CA 94560UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for searching, browsing, and organizing indexes of periodicals and publications; hand-held electronic devices, namely, mobile telephones, electronic personal organizers, and hand-held computers, all containing indexes of periodicals and publications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |