USPTO serial 75749137
DENTASONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2445706Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 24, 2001
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DENTASONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Offenbach a.M., DE
Offenbach a.M., DE
MUNICH, DE
Offenbach a.M., DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KLAUS P. STOFFEL
KLAUS P. STOFFEL Lucas & Mercanti, LLP475 Park Avenue South15th FloorNew York, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Electrical apparatuses for oral hygiene, namely, electric toothbrushes, electric tooth and mouth rinsing devices, electric false teeth cleaners, and parts for such devices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROWENTA-WERKE GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by ROWENTA-WERKE GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by L+P HOLDING GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by ROWENTA-WERKE GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named DENTASONIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 11, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |