USPTO serial 75749236
WESTAIM BIOMEDICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WESTAIM BIOMEDICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta, T8L 3W4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Brett Heavner
B BRETT HEAVNER FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT& DUNNER, LLP1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Antimicrobial metal coatings, namely, antimicrobial metal coatings for medical, dental and industrial applications; antimicrobial metal foils, powders and paints for medical, dental and industrial applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Antimicrobial medical and surgical wound and burn dressings | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical devices utilizing antimicrobial coatings, namely orthopaedic joint implants and appliances, namely external fixators and transcutaneous fixator devices for shoulders, hips, knees, and elbows; catheters utilizing antimicrobial coatings; catheter accessories utilizing antimicrobial coatings namely collection bags and tubings; wound closures utilizing antimicrobial coatings, namely surgical staples, sutures, tapes, bandages; abdominal support meshes and surgical draperies utilizing antimicrobial coatings; surgical cutting instruments utilizing antimicrobial coatings namely scalpels, scissors, curettes, trepans, trephines; surgical clamping and grasping instruments utilizing antimicrobial coatings, namely forceps, hemostats, clamps, and retractors; dental instruments utilizing antimicrobial coatings namely mirrors and probes; cannulated instruments for laproscopic and arthroscopic procedures all utilizing antimicrobial coatings; biopsy instruments utilizing antimicrobial coatings, namely needles and punches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |