USPTO serial 75749335
COREQUAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COREQUAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Plump
LESLIE PLUMP LESLIE PLUMP, PC500 N BROADWAYJERICHO, NY 11753UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO ANALYZE THE LIFE CYCLE OF MATERIALS WHICH HAVE A STIFF OUTER SKIN, A SOFTER AND THICK LIGHTWEIGHT STRUCTURAL FILLER MATERIAL, AND ANOTHER STIFF INNER SKIN ALL BONDED TOGETHER WHICH IS THEN KNOWN AS A SANDWICH COMPOSITE MATERIAL FOR PURPOSES OF EVALUATING THE SAFE ENGINEERING LIFE OF THESE MATERIALS WHICH HAVE A STIFF OUTER SKIN, A SOFTER AND THICK CORE MATERIAL, AND ANOTHER STIFF INNER SKIN USED IN THE ENGINEERING INDUSTRY; COMPUTER HARDWARE IN THE NATURE OF ELECTRICAL MICRO-SENSORS, OR PRESS-FIT FILM SHEETS WHICH CAN RECORD THE STRESS IN THE CORE OR THE INTERFACE BETWEEN THE CORE AND THE SKINS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |