Drawing for IMAGEGENETICS

USPTO serial 75749498

IMAGEGENETICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IMAGEGENETICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger T Barrett

ROGER T BARRETT TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DATA SEGMENTATION SERVICES FOR COMPLEX NATURAL SYSTEMS AND SEISMIC, MEDICAL AND HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES, AND CONSULTING SERVICES RELATED THERETOACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 9, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 23, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 24, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 30, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 29, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 14, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 27, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance