USPTO serial 75749666
IMPACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMPACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marilynn Burningham
MARILYNN BURNINGHAM NIELSEN & SENIOR, PC60 E S TEMPLE, STE 1100SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | digital printing services; namely, wide format short run reproductions of customer graphics as, for example, billboards, banners, wall displays, truck sides and backlits | ACTIVE | Aug 28, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |