USPTO serial 75749824
SMARTPART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 26, 2002
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMARTPART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
DAYTON, OH
Kirkland, Montreal, Province of Quebec, CA
Kirkland, Montreal, Province of Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alisha Huls, Samuel Digirolamo, Alan Nemes, Ralph Kalish, Danica Mathes, Wendy Boldt Cohen
Alisha Huls, Samuel Digirolamo, Alan Nemes, Ralph Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin LLP720 Olive St.24th FloorSt. Louis, MO 63101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Change part for use in industrial machines controlled by a computer that have embedded therein a memory module that contains machine set up information that is automatically downloaded to the computer to assist in automatically setting up various operating parameters of the machine based on the change part that has been installed and for performing the various operating parameters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 17, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NOVA PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PHARMA GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KALISH INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KALISH INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SMARTPART
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |