Drawing for THE RACE IS ON

USPTO serial 75749844

THE RACE IS ON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THAYER, GARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE RACE IS ON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rochelle D. Alpert

ROCHELLE D ALPERT BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWR1 MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software used for creating and managing an online business presence, and for providing an integrated set of platform tools and applications for creating and managing web sites suitable for online publishing/syndication, and for managing customer contact relationships and online distribution chains for online businesses, and instructional manuals sold together as a unitACTIVE—
041educational services, namely, providing training and seminars in the field of creating and managing an online business presence, and for creating and managing web sites suitable for online publication/syndication, and for managing customer contact relationships and online distribution chains for online businessACTIVE—
042computer software development, integration of computer systems, and computer terminal support services, namely troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via email and telephone; installation and maintenance of computer software in the field of creating and managing an online business presence, and for creating and managing web sites suitable for online publication/syndication, and for managing customer contact relationships and online distribution chains for online businessesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 26, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 24, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 27, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance