Drawing for WEBPURCHASING

USPTO serial 75750059

WEBPURCHASING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEBPURCHASING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONFIGURED TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC PURCHASE ORDERS, BILLING AND PAYMENT FUNCTIONS RELATED TO PROCUREMENT OF GOODS AND SERVICES; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGNED TO INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC COMMERCE FUNCTIONS, NAMELY, PROCESSING OF ON-LINE ELECTRONIC BUYING, SELLING AND PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ELECTRONIC STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL OF INFORMATION RELATED TO CATALOG RETAIL SERVICES, NAMELY, PRICE LISTINGS, PRODUCT AVAILABILITY AND PAYMENT INFORMATIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 3, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 3, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 22, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 11, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 23, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance