USPTO serial 75750224
OFFICETIGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 2002
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OFFICETIGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Staten Island, NY
Staten Island, NY
OFFICETIGER DATABASE SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, IN
Other trademarks owned by OFFICETIGER DATABASE SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
Staten Island, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MONICA B. RICHMAN
MONICA B RICHMAN BROWN, RAYMAN, MILLSTEIN, FELDER ET AL120 W 45TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | OUTSOURCING OF OFFICE FUNCTIONS, NAMELY TYPING SERVICES, RESEARCH SERVICES, DATA PROCESSING, AND ASSEMBLY OF DATA, DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND EDITING, IMAGING, AND CAD DESIGN | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OfficeTiger, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by OfficeTiger, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by OFFICETIGER DATABASE SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by OfficeTiger, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named OFFICETIGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |