USPTO serial 75750471
T.I.G.E.R.S. THE INSTITUTE OF GREATLY ENDANGERED AND RARE SPECIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with T.I.G.E.R.S. THE INSTITUTE OF GREATLY ENDANGERED AND RARE SPECIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Surfside Beach, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B CRAIG KILLOUGH
B CRAIG KILLOUGH BARNWEL WHALEY PATTERSON & HELMSPO BOX DRAWER HCHARLESTON, SC 29402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING DEMONSTRATIONS AND EXHIBITIONS TO EDUCATE AND ENTERTAIN THE PUBLIC ABOUT WILDLIFE AND THE PRESERVATION OF ENDANGERED SPECIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |