USPTO serial 75750864
SENSTAR STELLAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2729490Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2003
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SENSTAR STELLAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Carp, CA
CARP, ONTARIO, CA
Kanata Ontario, CA
Kanata Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. O'Malley
John J. O'Malley Volpe and Koenig, P.C.30 S. 17th Street, Suite 1600Philadelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Intrusion detectors, namely buried or aerial cable sensors, microphonic cable disturbance sensors, fence mounted detection sensors, electrostatic field disturbance senors, video motion sensors, microwave sensors, networking and display/control devices; parts for intrusion detection systems, namely sensor cables, connectors, transponders, transducers, transceivers, multiplex alarm monitors and procecessors, keypads, keyboards, display monitors, video display terminals, signal processors, central processing units, control switches, power supplies, lightning arrestors, weather station sensors, encryption systems, infrared illuminators, display panels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design of intrusion detection systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SENSTAR-STELLAR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SENSTAR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SENSTAR-STELLAR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SENSTAR-STELLAR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SENSTAR STELLAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |