USPTO serial 75750895
HOTTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAVONESE, DANIEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOTTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Skelmersdale WN8 8AX, GB
Skelmersdale WN8 8AX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan L. Dillon
JOAN L DILLON KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE ST STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Bags, namely men's, women's and children's hand bags, school bags, satchels; travel bags, namely carry-on and tote bags and all purpose sport bags; cases, namely, attache cases, business cases, business card cases, credit card cases and document cases and purses; men's and women's shoulder bags, men's and women's wallets, men's and women's hold-all travel bags, holdall overnight bags, and holdall shoulder bags, ruck sacks | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Articles of clothing, namely shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, sweaters, jackets, coats, trousers, pants, shorts, socks, hats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Beaconsfield Footwear Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Beaconsfield Footwear Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named HOTTER
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |