USPTO serial 75751294
KARTCHNER VILLAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTERMAN, ALEX
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KARTCHNER VILLAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian W. LaCorte
BRIAN W LACORTE GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, PA2575 E CAMELBACK RD STE 1100PHOENIX, AZ 85016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Shopping center services, namely, a commercial development containing a petroleum station, a convenience store, restaurants and a motel | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of the Max James Karchner and Dona Lee Kartchner Revocable Trust
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of the Max James Karchner and Dona Lee Kartchner Revocable Trust
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named KARTCHNER VILLAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |