Drawing for KARTCHNER VILLAGE

USPTO serial 75751294

KARTCHNER VILLAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTERMAN, ALEX
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KARTCHNER VILLAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian W. LaCorte

BRIAN W LACORTE GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, PA2575 E CAMELBACK RD STE 1100PHOENIX, AZ 85016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Shopping center services, namely, a commercial development containing a petroleum station, a convenience store, restaurants and a motelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 7, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 20, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 11, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance