Drawing for CHALLENGER

USPTO serial 75751360

CHALLENGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THAYER, GARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHALLENGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David E. Boundy

DAVID E BOUNDY SHEARMAN & STERLING599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for performing analysis, planning and development of strategic ideas and objectives related to management, staffing, financial, product marketing and development goals of businesses and professional organizations; computer software that provides a platform for and facilitates performing collaborative thinking and planning for teams and work groups related to management, staffing, financial, product marketing and development goals of businesses and professional organizations; computer software used to describe and develop collaborative project ideas related to management, staffing, financial, product marketing and development goals of businesses and professional organizations; computer software that provides review and management features that visually represent the organizational structure of businesses and professional organizations and their divisions, products and services, projects, and project teams; computer software that provides a visual summary of strategic information related to management, staffing, financial, project marketing and development goals of businesses and professional organizations; computer software that provides in visual and text format analytical categories, topics and questions for strategic business planning analysis and development of business and professional organizationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 2, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance