Drawing for Serial No. 75751554

USPTO serial 75751554

Serial No. 75751554

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75751554?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARY A. MOY

MARY A MOY LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018SOFT BABY CARRIERS WORN ON THE BODYACTIVEJul 4, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 13, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 13, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 18, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 18, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 9, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance