USPTO serial 75751625
DEEP ELLUM ARTS FESTIVAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 17, 2001
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DEEP ELLUM ARTS FESTIVAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JIM KUNTZ
Bente Goodall Millard Egenolf Associates LLP130 East Carrillo StreetSanta Barbara, CA 93101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the concerts of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 4, 1995 |
| 041 | entertainment, namely, live musical concerts; organizing community festivals featuring a variety of activities, namely, art exhibitions and music concerts; entertainment exhibitions in the nature of art and music festivals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 4, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |