Drawing for BMC SOFTWARE BUSINESS PARTNER

USPTO serial 75751632

BMC SOFTWARE BUSINESS PARTNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BMC SOFTWARE BUSINESS PARTNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANITA NESSER

Nathan C. Belzer BELZER PC2 East Bryan Street401 Johnson Square Business CenterSavannah, GA 31401-2640

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PARTNER PROGRAMS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING COMPUTER SYSTEMS, DATABASES AND APPLICATIONS, NAMELY PROVIDING DATA MANAGEMENT, APPLICATION MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION AND RECOVERY OF MAINFRAME AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS COMPUTERS AND THE DATABASE AND BUSINESS APPLICATIONS, PROGRAMS, AND SYSTEMS THAT OPERATE THEREINACTIVE—
042PARTNER PROGRAM SUPPORT AND CONSULTATION SERVICES FOR MANAGING COMPUTER SYSTEMS, DATABASES AND APPLICATIONS, NAMELY PROVIDING DATA MANAGEMENT, APPLICATION MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION AND RECOVERY OF MAINFRAME AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS COMPUTERS AND THE DATABASE AND BUSINESS APPLICATIONS, PROGRAMS, AND SYSTEMS THAT OPERATE THEREINACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 26, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 17, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 30, 2003IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Sep 10, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 7, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 21, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 23, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 22, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance