USPTO serial 75751720
M MALLNET.NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with M MALLNET.NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L Sigalow
DAVID L SIGALOW ALLEN DYER DOPPELT ET AL255 S ORANGE AVE STE 1401P 0 BOX 3791ORLANDO, FL 32802Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE RETAIL SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF CONSUMER GOODS, COMPUTER EQUIPMENT, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPACT DISCS FEATURING MUSIC AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE, PRERECORDED VIDEOS FEATURING MUSIC AND ENTERTAINMENT, ELECTRONIC HOME APPLIANCES, FLOWERS, FOOD, GOURMET ITEMS, OFFICE SUPPLIES, TOYS, GAMES, CLOTHING, MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTIONS, CREDIT CARDS, BABY GIFTS, BOOKS, PRERECORDED AUDIOTAPES FEATURING MUSIC AND TEXT, WATCHES, FRAGRANCES, COSMETICS, CLOCKS, EYEGLASSES, SWIM WEAR AND COLLECTIBLES; PROVIDING ON-LINE INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, ON-LINE AUCTIONS AND CONSUMER PRODUCT RATINGS OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Jun 10, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |