USPTO serial 75752102
YOURCYBERSOLUTION.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOURCYBERSOLUTION.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gwendolyn D Harris
GWENDOLYN D HARRIS GWENDOLYN D HARRIS PCP O BOX 501HUNTSVILLE, AL 35804-0501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for others which uses the global computer network for integrating and automating business processes, namely software for others which uses the global computer network to integrate and automate the internal processes of a business including processes used in ordering, order tracking, shipping, accounting, finance and customer service | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation services, namely consultation for integrating and automating business processes provided via the global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |