USPTO serial 75752122
AV / X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AV / X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell E Radin
MITCHELL E RADIN COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP41 MADISON AVE 34TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | anti-aging cream, anti-wrinkle cream, astringents for cosmetic purposes, bath powder, beauty masks, blush, blusher, body cream, body mask creams, body mask lotions, body mask powders, body masks, body oil, body powder, body scrubs, cold cream, compact containing makeup, facial concealers, cosmetic balls, cosmetic pads, cosmetic pencils, cotton balls for cosmetic purposes, cotton for cosmetic purposes, cotton puffs for cosmetic purposes, cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes, cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes, cream for cellulite reduction, cuticle conditioners, cuticle cream, cuticle removing preparations, deodorants, antiperspirants, depilatories, depilatory creams, emery boards, eye cream, eye gels, eye makeup remover, eye makeup, eye pencils, eye shadow, eyebrow pencils, eye liners, face creams, face powder, facial masks, facial scrubs, foundation makeup, hair gel, hair bleach, hair bleaching preparations, hair care preparations, hair cleaning preparations, hair color removers, hair color, hair conditioners, hair dye, hair gel, hair lighteners, hair lotions, hair mousse, hair pomades, hair relaxers, hair relaxing preparations, hair removing | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 009 | sunglasses, sunglass cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | jewelry, ornamental pins, jewelry lapel pins, broaches, necklaces, earrings, and bracelets | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | bags, namely handbags, all-purpose sport bags, purses, tote bags, macrame bags, duffle bags, overnight bags, wallet on a string bags, back packs, and canvas garment bags for storage | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | women's clothing, namely, tops, tee shirts, blouses, vests, turtlenecks, tank tops, tunics, sweatshirts, jackets, pullovers, shorts, shortalls, skorts, skirts, overalls, leggings, bottoms, swimwear, coats, socks, tights, body suits, scarves, belts, coordinated separates, namely, pants, skirts, blouses, blazers, vests, stirup pants; | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 035 | retail store services, on-line ordering services and direct mail retail store services all featuring clothing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UNITED RETAIL INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by Avenue, Inc., The
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named AV / X
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 27, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |