Drawing for SITE ENGINE

USPTO serial 75752279

SITE ENGINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SITE ENGINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erik B. Cherdak

ERIK B CHERDAK C/O STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP1330 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-1795UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, providing online content retrieval services for obtaining data on a global networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 10, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 10, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 10, 2002EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Jul 12, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 3, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 7, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance