USPTO serial 75752325
MAG JACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAG JACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jersey City, NJ
Jersey City, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY F. DIVINO
AMY F DIVINO STEINBERG & RASKIN PC1140 AVE OF THE AMERICAS, 15TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10036-5803UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | JACK CONNECTOR INCORPORATING A FILTER NETWORK, INCLUDING TRANSFORMERS AND RESISTOR ELEMENTS, FOR CONNECTION TO PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |