USPTO serial 75752644
SOLOSOUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOLOSOUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa Peller London
LISA PELLER LONDON FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DIRECTIONAL SOUND DELIVERY SYSTEMS COMPOSED OF AUDIO HARDWARE COMPONENTS, NAMELY, SPEAKERS ASSEMBLED IN A DIGPOLE CONFIGURATION, OPTIONAL DIRECTIONAL MICROPHONES, DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS, AUDIO AMPLIFIERS, AND PARTS THEREFOR, AND COMPRISING SOFTWARE THAT OPERATES THE DIRECTIONAL SOUND DELIVERY SYSTEMS, WHICH FEATURES ALGORITHMS FOR USE IN SPEECH AUDIO PROCESSING, WHICH SOUND DELIVERY SYSTEMS ARE INCORPORATED INTO NECK SETS, HEADRESTS, SEATING, KIOSKS, WALL-MOUNTS, AND SEATBELTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; AND CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DIRECTIONAL SOUND TECHNOLOGY, INCLUDING PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCT RESEARCH SERVICES FOR OTHERS, DESIGN SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF DIRECTIONAL SOUND TECHNOLOGY, AND DESIGNING STANDARDS, ALGORITHMS, PROTOCOLS, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR USE BY OTHERS, TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, RETURN AND REPAIR OF HARDWARE, TROUBLESHOOTING OF HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS AND AUDIO PARAMETER TUNING TO MEET SPECIFIC CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS, VIA REMOTE CONSULTING BY TELEPHONE, FAX, E-MAIL OR ON-SITE CONSULTING IN PERSON; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AND TESTING SERVICES FOR PRODUCT-SPECIFIC CONFIGURATIONS OF DIRECTIONAL SOUND TECHNOLOGY, AND PROVIDING A WEBSITE ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS FEATURING INFORMATION ON DIRECTIONAL SOUND TECHNOLOGY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Nortel Networks Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SOLOSOUND
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |