USPTO serial 75752715
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES BUSINESS COUNCIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATERS-PEREZ,KATHYRN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES BUSINESS COUNCIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael L. Lovitz
MICHAEL L LOVITZ PANITCH SCHWARZE JACOBS & NADELONE COMMERCE SQ2005 MARKET ST 22ND FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7086Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business networking in the field of environmental insurance and environmental risk management services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting seminars and continuing education classes in the field of environmental insurance and other environmental services for business, namely, environmental risk management and insurance loss control solutions, and providing information to customers of environmental insurance and other environmental services in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |