Drawing for GAME BANDITS

USPTO serial 75752759

GAME BANDITS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GAME BANDITS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM E. ALFORD

WILLIAM E ALFORD BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Interactive video game programs configured to play on video game machines; computer game cartridges, video game cartridges, computer game cassettes and game disks, namely floppy disks, CDROMs, DVDs, mini-discs, and HDCDsACTIVE—
028Stand alone video game machines; stand alone games configured to play on video game machines; hand held or wrist attached units having liquid crystal displays for playing electronic games; game equipment namely, game equipment with a watch function and integrated circuit chips; toys for children, namely, electrical action toys; playsets for toy figures, and toy action figures and accessories therefor; and toy vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 12, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 29, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 14, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 18, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 26, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 26, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance