USPTO serial 75752893
MILLENNIUM BUG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MILLENNIUM BUG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Hunsbury, Northampton, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V Dineff
LAUREL V DINEFF HOFFMANN & DINEFF. LTD820 W JACKSON BLVDSTE 370CHICAGO, IL 60607Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations and substances for animals for the treatment of vermin, sanitary preparations in the nature of all purpose disinfectants, fungicides for domestic, agricultural use and use on animals, insecticides for domestic, agricultural use and use on animals,pesticides for domestic, agricultural use and use on animals, preparations for destroying vermin | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |