USPTO serial 75753002
COTE D'AZUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COTE D'AZUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHANIE FURGANG ADWAR,
STEPHANIE FURGANG ADWAR FURGANG & ADWAR LLP2 CROSFIELD AVE STE 210WEST NYACK, NY 10994UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, SUNTANNING PREPARATIONS; SUNTAN GEL; SUNTAN LOTION; SUNTAN OIL; SUNTAN SPRAY; SUNTAN MOUSSE; AFTER-SUN LOTION; SELF-TANNING LOTIONS, OILS, MOUSSE; BATH FOAM, GELS, SALTS, OIL; BODY EMULSIONS, MOUSSE, CREAM, LOTION, OIL, MOISTURIZER, SCRUB; HAIR CARE PRODUCTS; HAIR STYLING PREPARATIONS; HAIR CONDITIONER; HAIR GEL, HAIR MOUSSE; HAIR POMADES; HAIR RINSES; HAIR SPRAY; HAIR SHAMPOO; BLUSHER; LIP POMADE; FACE POWDER; NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS; NAIL CREAM; NAIL ENAMELS; SKIN CONDITIONER, MOISTURIZER, CREAM, OIL, MOUSSE, LOTION; FACIAL TONERS, CREAM, LOTION, MOUSSE, EMULSION, CLEANSERS, MASKS, SCRUBS; SCENTED BODY SPRAY; SKIN TONERS; SKIN SOAP; SHOWER GEL; MASSAGE OIL; HAND CREAM | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |