USPTO serial 75753310
OUR HOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OUR HOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRERECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO RECORDINGS FEATURING MUSIC AND MUSICAL ARTISTS AND RELATED MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BROCHURES, NEWSLETTERS, POSTERS AND BOOKS FEATURING MUSIC AND MUSICAL ARTISTS AND MUSIC-RELATED ENTERTAINMENT INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | FULL LINE OF CLOTHING; T-SHIRTS, SHIRTS AND HATS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nash, Graham
- Other trademarks owned by Nash, Graham
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named OUR HOUSE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 21, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |