USPTO serial 75753432
BETTY BOOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BETTY BOOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry S Agdern
BARRY S AGDERN THE HEARST CORPORATION959 EIGHTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hearst Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hearst Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fleischer Studios, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fleischer Studios, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BETTY BOOP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |