USPTO serial 75753626
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CAROLE F. BARRETT
CAROLE F BARRETT COUDERT BROTHERS600 BEACH ST THIRD FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | webcasting audio/visual programming via global computer networks for legal professionals and their clients; on-line messaging services, namely, electronic transmission of data, images, and documents for legal professionals and their clients via computer terminals over global computer networks; electronic mail services provided to legal professionals and their clients; and electronic filing services, namely, the transmission of legal documents via computer terminals over global computer networks on behalf of legal professionals and their clients | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing information in the field of law for legal professionals and their clients, namely, legal research materials, directories of legal resources, and substantive information about the law via global computer networks; data encryption services provided to legal professionals and their clients via global computer networks; providing interactive on-line document sharing capabilities over computer networks and global computer networks to two or more legal professionals and their clients with access to such computer networks and global computer network; and litigation support services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |