USPTO serial 75753738
TRASHY PANTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRASHY PANTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill M. Pietrini
JILL M PIETRINI MANATT PHELPS & PHILLIPS11355 W OLYMPIC BLVD STE 10LOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | DISPOSABLE CLOTHING, NAMELY, UNDERWEAR, BRAS, T-SHIRTS, SLEEPWEAR, SLIPPERS, SOCKS, COVER-UPS, SARONGS AND SHORTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Falcone, Susan
- Other trademarks owned by Falcone, Angelo
- Other trademarks owned by Falcone, Susan
- Other trademarks owned by Falcone, Angelo
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named TRASHY PANTS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 28, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |