Drawing for AMERICAN SOCKET SCREW MANUFACTURING

USPTO serial 75753849

AMERICAN SOCKET SCREW MANUFACTURING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICAN SOCKET SCREW MANUFACTURING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen B. Goldman

STEPHEN B GOLDMAN LERNER DAVID LITTENBERG KRUMHOLZ & MENTL600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1497UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METAL FASTENERS, NAMELY, HEXAGON SOCKET HEAD CAP SCREWS, HEXAGON SOCKET HEAD SET SCREWS, HEXAGON BUTTON SOCKET HEAD CAP SCREWS, HEXAGON FLAT SOCKET HEAD CAP SCREWS, HEXAGON CAP SCREWS, HEXAGON NUT, DOWEL PINS, SPRING PINS, HEXAGON KEYS AND PRESSURE PLUGSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 20, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 27, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 9, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 8, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 2, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance