USPTO serial 75753944
*CHAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3121058Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 25, 2006
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with *CHAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter Steimel, Jr.
Walter Steimel, Jr. LOEB & LOEB LLP901 New York Ave NWSuite 300 EastWashington, DC 20001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | TELEPHONE DIRECTORY INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY GENERAL TELEPHONE LISTING DIRECTORIES; AND TELEPHONE, WIRELESS AND ONLINE DIRECTORY INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY DIRECTORIES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVITY, PERSONAL, DATING, RELIGIOUS, POLITICAL, HOROSCOPE AND SEXUALITY SERVICES AND FORUMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 14, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 5, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |